Naming the Will-RH Fundamentals
The Levels of Will was formulated at a late stage after much investigation, as explained here.
which isMuch earlier, the personal endeavour. At that time, dynamics within the Centres were taken for granted.
had been investigated as the source ofHere is the current formulation for the hierarchy showing provisional verbs:
L | RH: Will |
---|---|
7 | Be Willing |
6 | Hold Purposes |
5 | Create Communications |
4 | Use Experiences |
3 | Institute Changes |
2 | Construct Inquiries |
1 | Take Actions |
The
was subsequently developed as the basis of creativity.The Two Trees
Click on thumbnails to see Tree Centres and Channels.
RHK
This Tree, as developed within the endeavour satellite shows the lower 4 levels to be about actualizing effort and the handling of the practicalities of the endeavour.
The upper 3 levels are about transcendence of the current situation and development of a conception of the endeavour.
This confirms the original choice of name as:
« ». The Tree therefore provides for an « » whose context is « ». (Of course, in practice, an may not be . That is why bureaucratic endeavours often fail—and then the can help us determine how and where.)RsHK
The here. It was originally named , and is now re-named « » to follow the style used in the Primary Domains. It contains 28 components used naturally by everyone. As usual, all levels of occur in every .
was developed and postedThis conflicted at the time with the name then given to the
. In examining that Tree using the new perspective, it is evident that- the Centres and Channels in the Content section deal with provision of energies that stabilize and consolidate a transcendental conception.
- the Centres and Channels in the Context section provide necessary guidance through affirmation of realities, known and unknown, potential and existent.
Any conception of something non-existent leads to a mobile mental condition moving between immersion in what exists and immersion in what could be. In weak hands, this causes confusion, fear and distress. In strong hands, it offers guidance and confidence. This suggests that « » could be a reasonable name, i.e. one that captures its function. However, there may be other possibilities.
Note that this terminology allows for
that is not e.g. as used by politicians and confidence tricksters who activate only the lower 4 Centres.Combination
Considering these two
together, it is evident that a is the field within which take place. The desired effect is to , which depends on many component factors.A Personal Endeavour |
A Constructive Entanglement | ||
---|---|---|---|
Internal
Duality |
Root Vehicle RHK |
Root Effect RsH |
Root Field RsHK |
Context L7-L5 |
Conception Focus |
Being Creative
28 Components |
Reality Focus |
Content L4-L1 |
Practicalities Focus |
Conception Focus |
This completes the naming of Domain Fundamentals.
- Review naming of Domain Fundamentals.
- Continue with naming in the Domain Controls.
- Jump ahead to naming in the Ethical Controls.
Originally posted: 15-Feb-2015. Amended: 4-Sep-2016. Updated: 13-Jan-2023.